I am tired.
I had planned to be in bed by now, and I am so far behind on
so many things people are depending on me to do. But I can’t rest just yet, not
until I’ve articulated the thoughts swirling in my mind today while they are
still fresh (and before the world has begun, as it always does, to move on.)
I managed to avoid making any comment whatsoever on social
media about Rachel Dolezal, the white woman who has passed for years as black,
because her story itself makes me tired. But today, with all the media
attention to the horrible racist attack on the AME church in Charleston, SC
(the church of Denmark Vesey, as it turns out), and especially the responses to
it I’ve been seeing from conservatives (especially on Fox News, quelle
surprise), I keep thinking about what Dolezal’s story says about white
liberals, and what Fox’s responses (and many Republican politicians’) say about
white conservatives. And how it all ties together.
Most white Americans don’t want to face racism, and the
legacy of slavery. Understandable; it’s a hell of a thing to face. Being
members of the dominant end of the racial hierarchy, of course, gives white
folks the freedom (aka privilege) NOT to face such things, a freedom those
victimized by the hierarchy have never had. This deliberate blindness takes
different faces, though. One way to avoid facing race is to deny that it
exists, or that you personally benefit from it –to say that it is over, it was
the bad old days before you were born, and it has all been fixed so just get
over it. This denial becomes intrinsic to certain political views, hence you
have –not just politicians but “journalists” –saying it is impossible to know
the shooter’s motives, or even to deduce them, unless maybe he was motivated by
a hatred of Christmas or something.
That’s one way.
Another way is the route chosen by Rachel Dolezal, and by
some other white folks in less dramatic ways. It is embarrassing to be part of
the oppressive end of that hierarchy. We want to identify with the underdog.
There is more honor to be had by playing the part of the oppressed than the
oppressor. Dolezal went full-tilt with this approach, claiming not just
affinity or empathy with the black experience but… the actual black experience.
Which is patently ridiculous, like the prince dressing as a pauper and claiming
a full understanding of pauperism… when all he has to do is put his crown back
on and he is back on the ruling side, an option denied the myriad paupers. A
similar, but less dramatic, example was recently when Ben Affleck –the subject
of one of those “discover your ancestry” TV shows –tried to hide the fact that
one of his ancestors was a slave trader. That does not fit in with his personal
identity as a New England liberal “good guy.” It was embarrassing.
There are a couple of huge problems with this approach
(beyond the dissembling.)
Number one. As white Americans, it is absolutely essential
that we FACE THE TRUTH ABOUT RACE. It is what this country was built on, and
continues to echo into the present. It is the foundation, the chassis, of our
society, and simply ignoring that will never change anything. We have to recognize
our privilege, and yes, our communal culpability. We weren’t around back then,
true, but we’re around now and we are benefiting from the accrued advantages
of whiteness whether we recognize or admit it or not. Even if, like me, you
grew up poor and disadvantaged in other ways. Dolezal and Affleck did not want
to do this. They didn’t want to be associated with the “bad guys.” Again, who
could blame them. My point is: we have
to face up to our cultural (and family) pasts, all of us.
Number two. Now, I know Dolezal did a lot of good things (as
has Mr. Affleck). But she missed a chance to do it in a much more appropriate
way. Rather than culturally appropriating blackness, she could have worked just
as hard without fudging on her background. What this would have done: given her
the opportunity to take advantage of her privilege… to combat privilege. To
deconstruct it, to work against it from the inside. To work in a supporting
role at some times, and to step to the fore at others. Many people of color that I know grow weary of
being expected to explain the most fundamental things about race over and over
again to a white audience; white folks who get it have a responsibility to keep
trying to explain it to those who don’t, but without pushing people of color
out of the spotlight when they are talking about their own lived experiences.
What this approach would NOT have done for Ms. Dolezal:
allow her to be the victim. What it would not have done for Ben Affleck: allow
him to be the scion of a spotlessly heroic family. Well… too bad.
Most American Indian tribes in North America believed (and
still believe) in community responsibility, more than individual
responsibility. If your group collectively did something to disrupt the
spiritual balance of the universe, it was your responsibility to do what you
could to fix it, whether you personally had performed the actions or not. I
believe in this philosophy. It is not white guilt: it is white culpability and
responsibility. Not responsibility in a “White Man’s Burden / Nobless Oblige”
sense, tied to saviorism; responsibility in the American Indian sense, the
acknowledgement that your people have messed up and it is the duty of all of
you to do something about it. It must have been very tempting to Dolezal to
immerse herself so deeply into black culture, and into fighting injustice, that
she came to view and promote herself as black –but in a very real way, in doing
so she was shirking her duty in that fight. That duty: to recognize and
acknowledge her privilege, and to renounce the system that privileged her.
What does that look like? On a day like this…. When an
acknowledged racist has slain nine black people at a historic black church, and
many white people refuse to see race in it all, just as they refuse to see race
in the spate of killings of unarmed black men (and children)… what does it look
like?
It means raising your voice, fellow Caucasoid individuals.
It means saying “No, this IS about race, it IS about privilege. I am benefited
by it, but I condemn it, and I am calling for an end to it.” It means standing
in support of our brothers and sisters of color- without having what I think of
as a “Tarzan moment” when we swoop in and tell them how they should feel and
react, and show them the “right way” to do it. And “lead” them (cough cough,
Rachel Dolezal.) But most of all, it means admitting, and explaining to our
fellow white folks. Especially at times like this.
Again I say: I am so tired. Many of you are, as well. But we
have miles to go before we sleep.
God bless the members of the Emanuel AME Church, and God
strengthen us all.
Hear, hear.
ReplyDeleteGreat to see you back, albeit in this distressing context. I admire and support your position.
ReplyDeleteBeautiful post Troy. Very very eloquent.
ReplyDeleteThere is no compelling reason to confront any kind of tedious customs in light of the fact that instant text loans are efficient. What's more, it is fit for the salaried individuals, who have the lack of the little reserve unless they get their next payday. By means of the portable's assistance telephone, the candidates have the capacity to communicate something specific with the necessity of the earnest store that is around 100 with the brief while reimbursement length of time of 7 days. With the loan's assistance, the borrowers have the capacity to find their whole little monetary emergencies no sweat. Along these lines, benefit as much as possible from it by taking care of the various issues without a moment's delay.
ReplyDelete